IONZERA vs Zirfon: The Next-Generation AWE Membrane
Direct comparison with the industry-standard Zirfon PERL UTP 500 separator. See why electrolyser manufacturers are switching to IONZERA for lower resistance, thinner profiles, and reduced total cost of ownership.
Side-by-Side Specifications
Every key parameter compared. IONZERA vs Zirfon PERL UTP 500.
IONZERA
Next-Generation
Area Resistance
0.09-0.1 Ω·cm²
Thickness
350-410 μm
Pore Size
0.38-0.42 μm
Reinforcement
Mesh-free
Ceramic Phase
TiO₂ + GO
Origin
India
Zirfon
Conventional
Area Resistance
0.30 Ω·cm²
Thickness
500 ± 50 μm
Pore Size
~0.15 μm
Reinforcement
PPS mesh
Ceramic Phase
ZrO₂
Origin
Belgium
Why Choose IONZERA?
Six fundamental advantages over Zirfon PERL UTP 500.
3x Lower Resistance
Reduced power consumption per kg H₂
20% Thinner Profile
More compact electrolyser stacks
No PPS Mesh Cost
Simplified, economical production
GO Nanosheets
Enhanced ion transport + anti-fouling
TiO₂ Protection
Photocatalytic anti-degradation
Made in India
Faster delivery & customization
Explore Detailed Comparisons
Dive deeper into specific aspects of the IONZERA vs Zirfon comparison.
Ready to Upgrade from Zirfon?
Request a sample to test IONZERA in your electrolyser stack. Our engineering team will support you through qualification and integration.
Request a Sample